JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_first_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca1
decision or issuance date
1999-05-27
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public full-text mirror after no historical official opinion file was located. The mixed alternative posture is preserved, and no saving-clause merits proposition is adopted.

Open recorded mirror (not the official host) ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Barrett

Holdings used

  • COA and appellate preclearance requirements do not directly apply to a federal prisoner's claim actually proceeding under § 2241; classification remains separate.

Material limitation

Binding only in the First Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public full-text mirror after no historical official opinion file was located. The mixed alternative posture is preserved, and no saving-clause merits proposition is adopted. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

178 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 1999), 178 F.3d 42: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/198488/united-states-v-barrett/

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR1-003