JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_second_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca2
decision or issuance date
2003-08-04
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public full-text mirror after no historical official opinion file was located. Federal immigration-detention posture; no state-process or classification rule is inferred.

Open recorded mirror (not the official host) ↗

Linked modules

Drax v. Reno

Holdings used

  • Section 2253(c) does not apply to a federal habeas proceeding under § 2241.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Second Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Published precedential full opinion reviewed from a public full-text mirror after no historical official opinion file was located. Federal immigration-detention posture; no state-process or classification rule is inferred. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

338 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2003), 338 F.3d 106 n.12: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/782936/drax-v-reno/

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR2-003