JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_fifth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca5
decision or issuance date
2020-09-03
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. The defendant made no BOP request; no broader issue-exhaustion or merits proposition is inferred.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Franco

Holdings used

  • The filing prerequisite is a nonjurisdictional mandatory claim-processing rule; both statutory routes begin with a BOP request and the court must enforce the rule when properly raised.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Fifth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. The defendant made no BOP request; no broader issue-exhaustion or merits proposition is inferred. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

973 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2020), 973 F.3d 467–69: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-60473-CR0.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR5-004