JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_sixth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca6
decision or issuance date
2023-03-31
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Reassignment on remand was tied to repeated failures in that record, and no sentence reduction is required.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Domenech

Holdings used

  • The § 404 benchmark uses only Fair Sentencing Act changes; the court then may consider intervening information, must reason through nonfrivolous arguments, and must explain the decision adequately for review.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Sixth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Reassignment on remand was tied to repeated failures in that record, and no sentence reduction is required. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

63 F.4th 1078 (6th Cir. 2023), 63 F.4th 1083–86: https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/23a0059p-06.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR6-002