JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_eighth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca8
decision or issuance date
2019-12-11
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Only the no-hearing and standards-of-review propositions are used; Concepcion controls any question involving intervening information.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. McDonald

Holdings used

  • Section 404 eligibility is reviewed de novo, the discretionary grant or denial for abuse of discretion, and the First Step Act does not require a hearing.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Eighth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Only the no-hearing and standards-of-review propositions are used; Concepcion controls any question involving intervening information. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

944 F.3d 769 (8th Cir. 2019), 944 F.3d 771–72: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/19/12/191221P.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR8-002