JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_eighth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca8
decision or issuance date
2023-03-13
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. The holdings concern denial: an actual condition modification ordinarily triggers Rule 32.1, and Norris does not approve a record from which no basis can be discerned.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Norris

Holdings used

  • Rule 32.1(c)(1) does not require counsel or a hearing before denial of termination or modification, and a separate denial explanation is unnecessary when the record makes the court's basis discernible.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Eighth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. The holdings concern denial: an actual condition modification ordinarily triggers Rule 32.1, and Norris does not approve a record from which no basis can be discerned. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

62 F.4th 441 (8th Cir. 2023), 62 F.4th 445–51: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/23/03/213849P.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR8-005