JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source could not be reached · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_dc_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_cadc
decision or issuance date
2021-06-15
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Only the no-categorical-allocution proposition is used; Smith and Concepcion supply later explanation and review rules.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Lawrence

Holdings used

  • A defendant has no categorical right to allocution before the district court decides a § 404 sentence-reduction motion.

Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Only the no-categorical-allocution proposition is used; Smith and Concepcion supply later explanation and review rules. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

1 F.4th 40 (D.C. Cir. 2021), 1 F.4th 46–48: https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2021/06/20-3061-1902399.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIRDC-001