JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_dc_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_cadc
decision or issuance date
2002-01-25
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official court archive location and published full-text mirror reviewed. This custody-source exception prevents extending Sugarman's federal-prisoner rule to D.C. Superior Court judgments.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Madley v. U.S. Parole Commission

Holdings used

  • D.C. Superior Court process is treated as state-court process for § 2253(c)(1)(A), so a COA is required for the resulting § 2241 appeal.

Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official court archive location and published full-text mirror reviewed. This custody-source exception prevents extending Sugarman's federal-prisoner rule to D.C. Superior Court judgments. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

278 F.3d 1306 (D.C. Cir. 2002), 278 F.3d 1308–10: https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2002/01/00-5226a.txt

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIRDC-002