JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_dc_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_cadc
decision or issuance date
2023-07-21
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official GovInfo copy of the published opinion reviewed. Issue exhaustion is expressly unresolved; the opinion's separate change-in-law analysis is excluded from this procedural claim.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Wilson

Holdings used

  • The filing prerequisite is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule; the court expressly declined to decide whether issue exhaustion applies.

Material limitation

Binding only in the D.C. Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official GovInfo copy of the published opinion reviewed. Issue exhaustion is expressly unresolved; the opinion's separate change-in-law analysis is excluded from this procedural claim. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

77 F.4th 837 (D.C. Cir. 2023), 77 F.4th 842–45: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caDC-21-03074/pdf/USCOURTS-caDC-21-03074-0.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIRDC-003