Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology
This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.
- authority type
- case
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide
- publication status
- published_united_states_reports
- precedential status
- binding
- decision or issuance date
- 2013-06-13
- subsequent history
- Official source reviewed through 2026-08-25.
- negative treatment status
- Official primary sources checked through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
- material limitations
- Use only for the bounded propositions and limitations stated in the linked canonical module.
Open official source ↗
Linked modules
United States v. Davila
Holding used
Judicial participation violates Rule 11(c)(1), but the rule does not require automatic vacatur; Rule 11(h) and the full record control prejudice.
Material limitation
Preservation, timing, content, context, later proceedings, and the plea decision require case-specific assessment.
Official source and pinpoints
569 U.S. 597, 602–13 (2013): https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/boundvolumes/569bv.pdf