JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_nationwide
publication status
published_united_states_reports
precedential status
binding
decision or issuance date
2000-02-23
subsequent history
Official source reviewed through 2026-08-25.
negative treatment status
Official primary sources checked through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Use only for the bounded propositions and limitations stated in the linked canonical modules.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Roe v. Flores-Ortega

Holding or rule used

Requested-appeal performance, duty to consult, and forfeited-appeal prejudice.

Material limitation

Use only for the bounded proposition in the linked § 2255 module. State-habeas holdings are not silently converted into direct § 2255 holdings; record, circuit, local, deadline, custody, waiver, and classification issues remain separate where identified.

Official source and pinpoints

528 U.S. 470 (2000), 528 U.S. 477–86: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-528/pdf/USREPORTS-528-470.pdf