JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_nationwide
publication status
published_united_states_reports
precedential status
binding
decision or issuance date
1971-12-20
subsequent history
Official source reviewed through 2026-08-25.
negative treatment status
Official primary sources checked through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Use only for the bounded propositions and open questions stated in the linked canonical module.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

United States v. Marion

Holding used

The Sixth Amendment speedy-trial right begins with formal accusation or actual restraints from arrest and holding to answer, not the earlier investigative interval. Limitation statutes are the primary protection against stale charges, while due process can have a limited role upon proof of actual prejudice and improper delay.

Material limitation

Marion did not establish one complete abstract test for every due-process preaccusation-delay claim. Lovasco further explains the prejudice-and-reason inquiry.

Official source and pinpoints

404 U.S. 307, 313–20, 322–26 (1971): https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-404/pdf/USREPORTS-404-307.pdf