Prerelease Custody, Residential Reentry, Home Confinement, and the CARES Act
Residential reentry-center placement, ordinary home confinement, First Step Act prerelease custody, transfer to supervised release, and CARES Act home confinement are related but noninterchangeable authorities. A valid analysis identifies the governing lane, eligibility date, placement decision, and decisionmaker.
Ordinary prerelease custody under § 3624(c)
Section 3624(c)(1) directs the Bureau, to the extent practicable, to ensure that a prisoner spends a reasonable part of the final portion of the term—up to 12 months—under conditions that afford a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for reentry. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1)
The 12-month language is a ceiling for prerelease conditions, not a guaranteed residential reentry-center term; the statute retains practicability and individualized administration. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1), (6)
Under ordinary § 3624(c)(2), the Bureau may place a prisoner in home confinement for the shorter of ten percent of the imprisonment term or six months, and, to the extent practicable, must place lower-risk and lower-needs prisoners in home confinement for the maximum time permitted. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2)
The Bureau retains authority to return a prisoner from prerelease custody to a correctional facility when the statutory or placement conditions are violated. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(4)
Prerelease placement must be administered consistently with § 3621(b)'s individualized designation factors, the available facility and community resources, the judgment, public-safety constraints, and the prisoner's circumstances. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c)(6)
Section 251 of the Second Chance Act of 2007 expanded ordinary prerelease custody to a maximum of 12 months and required regulations assuring individualized decisions; it did not guarantee 12 months or replace later First Step Act mechanisms. Pub. L. No. 110-199, § 251, 122 Stat. 657, 692–94
The Bureau's community-confinement regulation requires individual determinations of duration consistent with § 3621(b), ordinarily made with enough time for planning, and confirms that an inmate may be considered for up to 12 months. 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20–570.22
The regulation does not impose a categorical six-month cap on residential reentry-center placement; it also does not create a right to the maximum statutory period. 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.21–570.22
First Step Act prerelease custody and supervised-release transfer
First Step Act time credits are earned under § 3632(d)(4), but they are applied through the separate eligibility and placement rules in § 3624(g); earning a credit and becoming eligible to apply it are not the same event. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3624(g), 3632(d)(4)
For prerelease custody under § 3624(g), the prisoner must have earned credits equal to the remainder of the imposed term, shown reduced recidivism risk or maintained minimum or low risk over the specified assessments, and had the remainder computed under applicable law. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(1)(A)–(D)(i)
A prisoner who does not satisfy the minimum-or-low-risk route may seek approval through the warden-petition route if the statutory prerequisites, including a determination that the prisoner would not endanger society and made a good-faith effort to lower risk, are met. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(1)(D)(i)(II)
Section 3624(g)(2) defines prerelease custody for this lane as home confinement or placement in a residential reentry center, subject to the subsection's conditions and Bureau administration. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)
First Step Act home confinement includes monitoring requirements and permits the Bureau to reduce monitoring after a prisoner demonstrates compliance; the statute separately authorizes return to prison for violations. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)(A)
First Step Act residential reentry-center placement must provide 24-hour staff, safe and adequate conditions, accountability, employment and family services, and substance-abuse and mental-health treatment access as specified by statute. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)(B)
Section 3624(g)(3) permits the Bureau to transfer an eligible prisoner to begin a court-imposed supervised-release term up to 12 months before the ordinary release date; it does not create supervised release when the judgment imposed none. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(3)
The early supervised-release transfer cannot exceed the prisoner's earned time credits, and the resulting supervision remains governed by the judgment and Chapter 229 rather than by BOP institutional rules. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(3)
The current First Step Act regulation implements credit application, including prerelease-custody and supervised-release transfer requirements, exclusions, risk criteria, and restoration; the official computation record controls the individualized credit balance. 28 C.F.R. §§ 523.42–523.44
The Bureau's Federal Time Credit Application Guide, announced October 16, 2025, was an informational explanation of how time credits are earned, calculated, and applied. The Bureau removed it from bop.gov in 2026 without a published notice, and an archived copy of the announcement remains. Guidance of this kind cannot enlarge or narrow the governing statute and regulation. BOP announcement, archived June 19, 2026
Ordinary home confinement administration
The Bureau's May 28, 2025 home-confinement directive instructs staff to maximize lawful home-confinement use, make individualized assessments, and avoid adding categorical barriers not found in statute or policy; it remains subordinate to governing law. BOP, Expanding Home Confinement
A sentencing-court recommendation may inform placement but does not itself order the Bureau to place a prisoner in home confinement or an RRC; the Bureau administers place of imprisonment and prerelease custody under the governing statutes. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c)
Home confinement is still service of the imprisonment term under Bureau custody and conditions; it is not the same as release from imprisonment, probation, or supervised release. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c), (g)
An individualized placement review requires the projected release date, statutory eligibility calculation, earned-credit ledger, PATTERN history, needs, discipline, detainers and unresolved charges, residence, treatment and employment plan, accessibility and medical needs, community resources, and reasons for the decision. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c), (g); 28 C.F.R. pt. 570, subpt. B
CARES Act home confinement
CARES Act § 12003(b)(2) temporarily authorized the Bureau Director, after the Attorney General's emergency finding and during the defined covered emergency period, to lengthen the maximum home-confinement period otherwise authorized by § 3624(c)(2). Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516
The CARES Act defined the covered emergency period by reference to the March 13, 2020 national emergency and 30 days after its termination; Public Law 118-3 terminated that national emergency on April 10, 2023, so the temporary authority to make new expanded-period placements is not an open-ended present authority. Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(a)(2); Pub. L. No. 118-3, 137 Stat. 6
The 2023 final rule confirms that, after the covered emergency period, the Director retains discretion to allow prisoners already placed in CARES Act home confinement to remain there or to return them to secure custody, consistent with law and individualized administration. 28 C.F.R. § 0.120; 88 Fed. Reg. 19830 (Apr. 4, 2023)
The final rule does not convert CARES Act home confinement into a judicial sentence reduction or a guarantee against return; it preserves Bureau discretion and permits proportional sanctions, RRC transfer, or secure-custody return under applicable criteria. 28 C.F.R. § 0.120; 88 Fed. Reg. 19830
For a person now in CARES Act home confinement, distinguish the historical placement authority, present custody status, remaining imprisonment term, imposed supervised-release term, alleged violation, sanction process, and any requested return or continuation decision. 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 28 C.F.R. § 0.120
Review and remedy classification
Section 3625 excludes specified APA provisions from determinations under §§ 3621–3624; a challenge therefore must identify a reviewable statutory, regulatory, or constitutional error rather than ask a court to make the placement choice entrusted to the Bureau. 18 U.S.C. § 3625
A prisoner ordinarily should present a disputed eligibility calculation, omitted individualized consideration, or asserted legal error through the Administrative Remedy Program with the supporting computation and placement records. 28 C.F.R. pt. 542, subpt. B
If a live claim challenges the execution of physical custody and is cognizable in habeas, § 2241's immediate-custodian and territorial-jurisdiction rules ordinarily govern; the requested relief still cannot exceed the court's lawful authority. 28 U.S.C. § 2241; Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434–47 (2004)
The requested remedy must be stated precisely: correct a credit balance or eligibility date, perform an omitted individualized review, comply with a governing legal limit, or reverse a procedurally defective return—not “order home confinement” without identifying a source of judicial power. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3624–3625
No release date or placement follows from the phrase “First Step Act eligible” alone; the conviction exclusions, earning periods, assessment history, credit ledger, disciplinary adjustments, final removal order, sentence remainder, residence and community plan, and current custody authority all require verification. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3624(g), 3632(d)(4)
Release and the supervised-release boundary
Section 3624(a) directs release when the imprisonment term expires, less properly credited time, and § 3624(d) specifies release planning and identification duties; neither provision authorizes an unverified release-date estimate. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(a), (d)
A supervised-release term commences on the day the person is released from imprisonment and does not run during imprisonment of more than 30 consecutive days in connection with a conviction unless the imprisonment runs concurrently with supervised release. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)
United States v. Johnson holds that excess prison time does not reduce a supervised-release term under § 3624(e), while identifying § 3583(e)'s modification and early-termination mechanisms as the statutory tools for equitable concerns after supervision begins. 529 U.S. 53, 57–60 (2000)
Mont v. United States holds that pretrial detention later credited toward a new conviction qualifies as imprisonment “in connection with a conviction” and tolls supervised release under § 3624(e), even though the credit determination occurs later. 587 U.S. 514, 518–24 (2019)
Decision path
flowchart TD
A["Requested community placement or earlier transition"] --> B{"Which authority?"}
B -->|"Ordinary prerelease"| C["Apply § 3624(c), § 3621(b), and Part 570"]
B -->|"Earned FSA credits"| D["Audit §§ 3632(d)(4) and 3624(g) plus Part 523"]
B -->|"Existing CARES placement"| E["Apply § 0.120 and current individualized record"]
C --> F{"RRC, home confinement, or supervised release?"}
D --> F
E --> F
F --> G["Calculate statutory ceiling and verify eligibility, record, conditions, and decisionmaker"]
G --> H["Use Part 542; separate legal error from discretionary placement choice"]
Required records and limits
- Judgment, sentence computation, projected release date, good-time and FSA-credit ledgers.
- PATTERN assessments, needs assessments, programming and discipline records, detainers, and final removal order if any.
- RRC and home-confinement referrals, reviews, reasons, bed or monitoring availability, residence and reentry plans.
- CARES Act placement and conditions, incident and sanction record, and current custody decision.
- Current circuit authority on cognizability, exhaustion, § 3625, available relief, and mootness.
Claim-level source records
CLM-BOPPRE-001 · verified_current
Section 3624(c)(1) directs the Bureau, to the extent practicable, to ensure that a prisoner spends a reasonable part of the final portion of the term—up to 12 months—under conditions that afford a reasonable opportunity to adjust to and prepare for reentry. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-002 · verified_current
The 12-month language is a ceiling for prerelease conditions, not a guaranteed residential reentry-center term; the statute retains practicability and individualized administration. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1), (6)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-003 · verified_current
Under ordinary § 3624(c)(2), the Bureau may place a prisoner in home confinement for the shorter of ten percent of the imprisonment term or six months, and, to the extent practicable, must place lower-risk and lower-needs prisoners in home confinement for the maximum time permitted. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-004 · verified_current
The Bureau retains authority to return a prisoner from prerelease custody to a correctional facility when the statutory or placement conditions are violated. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(4)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-005 · verified_current
Prerelease placement must be administered consistently with § 3621(b)'s individualized designation factors, the available facility and community resources, the judgment, public-safety constraints, and the prisoner's circumstances. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c)(6)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. § 3621
CLM-BOPPRE-006 · verified_current
Section 251 of the Second Chance Act of 2007 expanded ordinary prerelease custody to a maximum of 12 months and required regulations assuring individualized decisions; it did not guarantee 12 months or replace later First Step Act mechanisms. [Pub. L. No. 110-199, § 251, 122 Stat. 657, 692–94](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-110publ199/pdf/PLAW-110publ199.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: Pub. L. No. 110-199, § 251, 122 Stat. 657, 692 (2008); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-007 · verified_current
The Bureau's community-confinement regulation requires individual determinations of duration consistent with § 3621(b), ordinarily made with enough time for planning, and confirms that an inmate may be considered for up to 12 months. [28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20–570.22](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-570/subpart-B)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. pt. 570, subpt. B; 18 U.S.C. § 3621
CLM-BOPPRE-008 · verified_current
The regulation does not impose a categorical six-month cap on residential reentry-center placement; it also does not create a right to the maximum statutory period. [28 C.F.R. §§ 570.21–570.22](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-570/subpart-B)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_prerelease_custody_under_3624_c
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. pt. 570, subpt. B
CLM-BOPPRE-009 · verified_current
First Step Act time credits are earned under § 3632(d)(4), but they are applied through the separate eligibility and placement rules in § 3624(g); earning a credit and becoming eligible to apply it are not the same event. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3624(g), 3632(d)(4)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. § 3632
CLM-BOPPRE-010 · verified_current
For prerelease custody under § 3624(g), the prisoner must have earned credits equal to the remainder of the imposed term, shown reduced recidivism risk or maintained minimum or low risk over the specified assessments, and had the remainder computed under applicable law. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(1)(A)–(D)(i)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-011 · verified_current
A prisoner who does not satisfy the minimum-or-low-risk route may seek approval through the warden-petition route if the statutory prerequisites, including a determination that the prisoner would not endanger society and made a good-faith effort to lower risk, are met. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(1)(D)(i)(II)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-012 · verified_current
Section 3624(g)(2) defines prerelease custody for this lane as home confinement or placement in a residential reentry center, subject to the subsection's conditions and Bureau administration. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-013 · verified_current
First Step Act home confinement includes monitoring requirements and permits the Bureau to reduce monitoring after a prisoner demonstrates compliance; the statute separately authorizes return to prison for violations. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)(A)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-014 · verified_current
First Step Act residential reentry-center placement must provide 24-hour staff, safe and adequate conditions, accountability, employment and family services, and substance-abuse and mental-health treatment access as specified by statute. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(2)(B)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-015 · verified_current
Section 3624(g)(3) permits the Bureau to transfer an eligible prisoner to begin a court-imposed supervised-release term up to 12 months before the ordinary release date; it does not create supervised release when the judgment imposed none. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-016 · verified_current
The early supervised-release transfer cannot exceed the prisoner's earned time credits, and the resulting supervision remains governed by the judgment and Chapter 229 rather than by BOP institutional rules. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(g)(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-017 · verified_current
The current First Step Act regulation implements credit application, including prerelease-custody and supervised-release transfer requirements, exclusions, risk criteria, and restoration; the official computation record controls the individualized credit balance. [28 C.F.R. §§ 523.42–523.44](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-B/part-523/subpart-E)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. §§ 523.40–523.44; 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-018 · verified_current
The Bureau's Federal Time Credit Application Guide, announced October 16, 2025, was an informational explanation of how time credits are earned, calculated, and applied. The Bureau removed it from bop.gov in 2026 without a published notice, and an archived copy of the announcement remains. Guidance of this kind cannot enlarge or narrow the governing statute and regulation. [BOP announcement, archived June 19, 2026](https://web.archive.org/web/20260619204331/https://www.bop.gov/news/20251016-federal-time-credit-application-guide.jsp)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- first_step_act_prerelease_custody_and_supervised_release_transfer
- classification
- mixed
- last verified
- 2026-10-15
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted. Re-reviewed 2026-10-15 against the sources listed in maintenance/legal-review-2026-10-15.md; wording approved by the owner.
Authorities: BOP FTC Application Guide (Oct. 16, 2025); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-019 · verified_current
The Bureau's May 28, 2025 home-confinement directive instructs staff to maximize lawful home-confinement use, make individualized assessments, and avoid adding categorical barriers not found in statute or policy; it remains subordinate to governing law. [BOP, Expanding Home Confinement](https://www.bop.gov/news/pdfs/20250528-home-confinement-expansioin.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_home_confinement_administration
- classification
- mixed
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: BOP Memorandum (May 28, 2025); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-020 · verified_current
A sentencing-court recommendation may inform placement but does not itself order the Bureau to place a prisoner in home confinement or an RRC; the Bureau administers place of imprisonment and prerelease custody under the governing statutes. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_home_confinement_administration
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. § 3621
CLM-BOPPRE-021 · verified_current
Home confinement is still service of the imprisonment term under Bureau custody and conditions; it is not the same as release from imprisonment, probation, or supervised release. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(c), (g)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_home_confinement_administration
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-022 · verified_current
An individualized placement review requires the projected release date, statutory eligibility calculation, earned-credit ledger, PATTERN history, needs, discipline, detainers and unresolved charges, residence, treatment and employment plan, accessibility and medical needs, community resources, and reasons for the decision. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3624(c), (g)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624); [28 C.F.R. pt. 570, subpt. B](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-D/part-570/subpart-B)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- ordinary_home_confinement_administration
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 28 C.F.R. pt. 570, subpt. B
CLM-BOPPRE-023 · verified_current
CARES Act § 12003(b)(2) temporarily authorized the Bureau Director, after the Attorney General's emergency finding and during the defined covered emergency period, to lengthen the maximum home-confinement period otherwise authorized by § 3624(c)(2). [Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-116publ136/pdf/PLAW-116publ136.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- cares_act_home_confinement
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003, 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020)
CLM-BOPPRE-024 · verified_current
The CARES Act defined the covered emergency period by reference to the March 13, 2020 national emergency and 30 days after its termination; Public Law 118-3 terminated that national emergency on April 10, 2023, so the temporary authority to make new expanded-period placements is not an open-ended present authority. [Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(a)(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-116publ136/pdf/PLAW-116publ136.pdf); [Pub. L. No. 118-3, 137 Stat. 6](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-118publ3/pdf/PLAW-118publ3.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- cares_act_home_confinement
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003, 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020); Pub. L. No. 118-3, operative unnumbered clause, 137 Stat. 6 (2023)
CLM-BOPPRE-025 · verified_current
The 2023 final rule confirms that, after the covered emergency period, the Director retains discretion to allow prisoners already placed in CARES Act home confinement to remain there or to return them to secure custody, consistent with law and individualized administration. [28 C.F.R. § 0.120](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-0/subpart-R/section-0.120); [88 Fed. Reg. 19830 (Apr. 4, 2023)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-04-04/pdf/2023-07063.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- cares_act_home_confinement
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. § 0.120; Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003, 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020)
CLM-BOPPRE-026 · verified_current
The final rule does not convert CARES Act home confinement into a judicial sentence reduction or a guarantee against return; it preserves Bureau discretion and permits proportional sanctions, RRC transfer, or secure-custody return under applicable criteria. [28 C.F.R. § 0.120](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-0/subpart-R/section-0.120); [88 Fed. Reg. 19830](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-04-04/pdf/2023-07063.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- cares_act_home_confinement
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. § 0.120
CLM-BOPPRE-027 · verified_current
For a person now in CARES Act home confinement, distinguish the historical placement authority, present custody status, remaining imprisonment term, imposed supervised-release term, alleged violation, sanction process, and any requested return or continuation decision. [18 U.S.C. § 3624](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624); [28 C.F.R. § 0.120](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-I/part-0/subpart-R/section-0.120)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- cares_act_home_confinement
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003, 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020); 28 C.F.R. § 0.120
CLM-BOPPRE-028 · verified_current
Section 3625 excludes specified APA provisions from determinations under §§ 3621–3624; a challenge therefore must identify a reviewable statutory, regulatory, or constitutional error rather than ask a court to make the placement choice entrusted to the Bureau. [18 U.S.C. § 3625](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3625)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- review_and_remedy_classification
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3625; 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-029 · verified_current
A prisoner ordinarily should present a disputed eligibility calculation, omitted individualized consideration, or asserted legal error through the Administrative Remedy Program with the supporting computation and placement records. [28 C.F.R. pt. 542, subpt. B](https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-28/chapter-V/subchapter-C/part-542/subpart-B)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- review_and_remedy_classification
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 C.F.R. pt. 542, subpt. B
CLM-BOPPRE-030 · verified_current
If a live claim challenges the execution of physical custody and is cognizable in habeas, § 2241's immediate-custodian and territorial-jurisdiction rules ordinarily govern; the requested relief still cannot exceed the court's lawful authority. [28 U.S.C. § 2241](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/28/2241); [*Rumsfeld v. Padilla*, 542 U.S. 426, 434–47 (2004)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-542/pdf/USREPORTS-542-426.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- review_and_remedy_classification
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 28 U.S.C. § 2241; 542 U.S. 426 (2004)
CLM-BOPPRE-031 · verified_current
The requested remedy must be stated precisely: correct a credit balance or eligibility date, perform an omitted individualized review, comply with a governing legal limit, or reverse a procedurally defective return—not “order home confinement” without identifying a source of judicial power. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3624–3625](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- review_and_remedy_classification
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. § 3625
CLM-BOPPRE-032 · verified_current
No release date or placement follows from the phrase “First Step Act eligible” alone; the conviction exclusions, earning periods, assessment history, credit ledger, disciplinary adjustments, final removal order, sentence remainder, residence and community plan, and current custody authority all require verification. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3624(g), 3632(d)(4)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3632)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- review_and_remedy_classification
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. § 3632
CLM-BOPPRE-033 · verified_current
Section 3624(a) directs release when the imprisonment term expires, less properly credited time, and § 3624(d) specifies release planning and identification duties; neither provision authorizes an unverified release-date estimate. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(a), (d)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- release_and_the_supervised_release_boundary
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-034 · verified_current
A supervised-release term commences on the day the person is released from imprisonment and does not run during imprisonment of more than 30 consecutive days in connection with a conviction unless the imprisonment runs concurrently with supervised release. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- release_and_the_supervised_release_boundary
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-BOPPRE-035 · verified_current
*United States v. Johnson* holds that excess prison time does not reduce a supervised-release term under § 3624(e), while identifying § 3583(e)'s modification and early-termination mechanisms as the statutory tools for equitable concerns after supervision begins. [529 U.S. 53, 57–60 (2000)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-53.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- release_and_the_supervised_release_boundary
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 529 U.S. 53 (2000); 18 U.S.C. § 3624; 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-BOPPRE-036 · verified_current
*Mont v. United States* holds that pretrial detention later credited toward a new conviction qualifies as imprisonment “in connection with a conviction” and tolls supervised release under § 3624(e), even though the credit determination occurs later. [587 U.S. 514, 518–24 (2019)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-587/pdf/USREPORTS-587-514.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_and_record_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- release_and_the_supervised_release_boundary
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The actual judgment, custody chronology, computation, detainer, discipline, program, assessment, placement, administrative record, present custodian, controlling circuit, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, eCFR, session law, BOP, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual result is asserted.
Authorities: 587 U.S. 514 (2019); 18 U.S.C. § 3624