Supervised Release Commencement, Conditions, Modification, Termination, and Transfer
Supervised release is a distinct post-imprisonment sentence component. Before choosing a procedure, identify the original offense and judgment, statutory maximum and any offense-specific term, actual release and custody dates, every condition, the district holding jurisdiction, and whether the requested relief is correction, modification, early termination, transfer, or a later revocation question.
Imposition and authorized term
A court may include supervised release after imprisonment and must do so when a statute requires it; the domestic-violence provision in § 3583(a) supplies an additional mandatory circumstance. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(a)
Unless another statute provides otherwise, § 3583(b) sets default maximum terms of five years for a Class A or B felony, three years for a Class C or D felony, one year for a Class E felony or misdemeanor other than a petty offense, and no term for a petty offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)
At initial imposition, § 3583(c) directs consideration of only the listed § 3553(a) factors; it does not incorporate every subsection of § 3553(a). 18 U.S.C. § 3583(c)
The applicable offense statute can require a minimum, authorize a different maximum, or otherwise displace § 3583(b)'s defaults, so the statute of conviction and offense date must be checked before calculating the permissible term. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)
Commencement and tolling
A supervised-release term begins on the day the person is released from imprisonment, and it runs concurrently with federal, state, or local probation, supervised release, or parole for another offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)
Section 3624(e) excludes from the supervised-release term a period of imprisonment exceeding thirty consecutive days in connection with a federal, state, or local conviction. 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)
Pretrial detention later credited to a new conviction qualifies as imprisonment in connection with that conviction and tolls supervised release under § 3624(e). Mont v. United States, 587 U.S. 514, 518–24 (2019)
Excess time served in prison does not shorten the supervised-release term because § 3624(e) starts that term on actual release; equitable relief, if warranted, lies through § 3583(e)'s modification or termination tools. United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53, 57–60 (2000)
The Sentencing Reform Act does not automatically stop or extend a supervised-release term merely because a person absconds; Rico requires use of the enacted tolling, modification, and delayed-revocation provisions rather than a judge-made fugitive-tolling rule. Rico v. United States, 607 U.S. ___, slip op. 1–16 (2026)
The actual release, detention, conviction-credit, warrant, summons, transfer, and expiration records control the term calculation; labels such as “absconded,” “inactive,” or “tolled” cannot replace that chronology. Rico, 607 U.S. ___, slip op. 8–16
Conditions
Section 3583(d) imposes listed mandatory conditions and authorizes discretionary conditions drawn from § 3563(b) plus other appropriate conditions. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)
A discretionary condition must be reasonably related to the specified history, deterrence, protection, and treatment factors, involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary for the specified purposes, and be consistent with Sentencing Commission policy statements. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1)–(3)
Current Guidelines § 5D1.3 distinguishes mandatory, standard, and special conditions and directs individualized selection within the statutory limits; a guideline condition does not override § 3583(d). U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3 (2025)
An occupational restriction under § 5F1.5 requires a reasonably direct relationship between the occupation and offense conduct, necessity to protect the public from similar unlawful conduct, and the minimum time and extent needed. U.S.S.G. § 5F1.5 (2025)
For a person required to register under SORNA, § 3583(d) authorizes the stated search condition only on reasonable suspicion and at a reasonable time and manner, with a probation-officer search also permitted when necessary for the probation officer's duties. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)
The court imposes the condition of supervised release; probation may administer implementation details only within the lawful condition and the controlling circuit's nondelegation boundaries. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)
Whether an internet, treatment, search, association, travel, residence, employment, financial, or third-party-notification condition is valid depends on its precise text, the sentencing record, statutory fit, constitutional burden, and controlling circuit law. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)
Modification, extension, and early termination
Before the term expires or is terminated, the court may modify, reduce, or enlarge conditions under § 3583(e)(2), subject to Rule 32.1(c). 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2); Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)
Rule 32.1(c) ordinarily requires a modification hearing, counsel, and an opportunity to make a statement and present mitigation. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(1)(E)
The court may dispense with a Rule 32.1(c) hearing if the person waives it, or if the proposed change is favorable and does not extend the term and the government has notice, an opportunity to object, and does not object. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)
If the original term was shorter than the maximum authorized term, § 3583(e)(2) permits extension before expiration or termination; it does not authorize revival of an already expired term outside § 3583(i). 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2), (i)
After one year of felony supervised release, the court may terminate the remaining term if the person's conduct and the interest of justice warrant it after considering the factors listed in § 3583(e). 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1)
Early termination is discretionary rather than automatic; the statute does not make government or probation consent a prerequisite. 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1)
Effective November 1, 2025, Guidelines § 5D1.4 recommends an individualized assessment for modification, early termination after one year, and extension; its consultation recommendation does not add a consent requirement to § 3583(e). U.S.S.G. § 5D1.4 (2025)
Section 3583(e) permits a court to consider excess imprisonment and other verified post-sentencing circumstances when deciding modification or termination, but Johnson does not require a particular equitable result. Johnson, 529 U.S. at 60
For modification, termination, extension, and revocation decisions under § 3583(e), the court considers only the factors that subsection expressly lists, including § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B)–(D), (a)(4)–(7), but not § 3553(a)(2)(A). 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)
Transfer and record controls
The sentencing court may transfer jurisdiction over supervised release to another district only with that district court's concurrence; after transfer, the receiving court may exercise the statutory powers specified in § 3605. 18 U.S.C. § 3605
Supervision in another district is not by itself a transfer of judicial jurisdiction; the transfer order, concurrence, docket, and probation arrangements must be distinguished. 18 U.S.C. § 3605
A filing should identify the court holding jurisdiction, requested statutory action, current term calculation, exact condition or relief, supporting record, and any pending violation or transfer proceeding. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(e), 3605
Rule 32.1(d) contains only a cross-reference to the governing disposition statutes; it does not itself require written or oral findings, so any findings or reasons requirement must come from another verified authority. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(d)
Practical audit
- Identify the statute of conviction, offense class, offense date, and offense-specific supervised-release provision.
- Obtain the judgment, amended judgments, conditions, release date, custody chronology, and current probation record.
- Calculate commencement and only enacted tolling; do not insert automatic absconding tolling.
- Confirm which district holds jurisdiction and whether a § 3605 transfer was completed.
- Select correction, modification, early termination, extension, or a revocation route and apply its distinct hearing and timing rules.
Claim-level source records
CLM-SRTERM-001 · verified_current
A court may include supervised release after imprisonment and must do so when a statute requires it; the domestic-violence provision in § 3583(a) supplies an additional mandatory circumstance. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(a)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- imposition_and_authorized_term
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-002 · verified_current
Unless another statute provides otherwise, § 3583(b) sets default maximum terms of five years for a Class A or B felony, three years for a Class C or D felony, one year for a Class E felony or misdemeanor other than a petty offense, and no term for a petty offense. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- imposition_and_authorized_term
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-003 · verified_current
At initial imposition, § 3583(c) directs consideration of only the listed § 3553(a) factors; it does not incorporate every subsection of § 3553(a). [18 U.S.C. § 3583(c)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- imposition_and_authorized_term
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583; 18 U.S.C. §§ 3551, 3552, 3553
CLM-SRTERM-004 · verified_current
The applicable offense statute can require a minimum, authorize a different maximum, or otherwise displace § 3583(b)'s defaults, so the statute of conviction and offense date must be checked before calculating the permissible term. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- imposition_and_authorized_term
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-005 · verified_current
A supervised-release term begins on the day the person is released from imprisonment, and it runs concurrently with federal, state, or local probation, supervised release, or parole for another offense. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-006 · verified_current
Section 3624(e) excludes from the supervised-release term a period of imprisonment exceeding thirty consecutive days in connection with a federal, state, or local conviction. [18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3624)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-007 · verified_current
Pretrial detention later credited to a new conviction qualifies as imprisonment in connection with that conviction and tolls supervised release under § 3624(e). [*Mont v. United States*, 587 U.S. 514, 518–24 (2019)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-587/pdf/USREPORTS-587-514.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 587 U.S. 514 (2019); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-008 · verified_current
Excess time served in prison does not shorten the supervised-release term because § 3624(e) starts that term on actual release; equitable relief, if warranted, lies through § 3583(e)'s modification or termination tools. [*United States v. Johnson*, 529 U.S. 53, 57–60 (2000)](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-53.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 529 U.S. 53 (2000); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-009 · verified_current
The Sentencing Reform Act does not automatically stop or extend a supervised-release term merely because a person absconds; *Rico* requires use of the enacted tolling, modification, and delayed-revocation provisions rather than a judge-made fugitive-tolling rule. [*Rico v. United States*, 607 U.S. ___, slip op. 1–16 (2026)](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1056_qn12.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 607 U.S. ___ (2026); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583; 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-010 · verified_current
The actual release, detention, conviction-credit, warrant, summons, transfer, and expiration records control the term calculation; labels such as “absconded,” “inactive,” or “tolled” cannot replace that chronology. [*Rico*, 607 U.S. ___, slip op. 8–16](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1056_qn12.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- commencement_and_tolling
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 607 U.S. ___ (2026); 18 U.S.C. § 3624
CLM-SRTERM-011 · verified_current
Section 3583(d) imposes listed mandatory conditions and authorizes discretionary conditions drawn from § 3563(b) plus other appropriate conditions. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-012 · verified_current
A discretionary condition must be reasonably related to the specified history, deterrence, protection, and treatment factors, involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary for the specified purposes, and be consistent with Sentencing Commission policy statements. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1)–(3)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-013 · verified_current
Current Guidelines § 5D1.3 distinguishes mandatory, standard, and special conditions and directs individualized selection within the statutory limits; a guideline condition does not override § 3583(d). [U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3 (2025)](https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/2025-guidelines-manual/annotated-2025-chapter-5)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- mixed
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: U.S.S.G. §§ 5D1.3–5D1.4, 5F1.5 (2025)
CLM-SRTERM-014 · verified_current
An occupational restriction under § 5F1.5 requires a reasonably direct relationship between the occupation and offense conduct, necessity to protect the public from similar unlawful conduct, and the minimum time and extent needed. [U.S.S.G. § 5F1.5 (2025)](https://guidelines.ussc.gov/apex/r/ussc_apex/guidelinesapp/guidelines?APP_GL_ID=%C2%A75F1.5)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- mixed
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: U.S.S.G. §§ 5D1.3–5D1.4, 5F1.5 (2025)
CLM-SRTERM-015 · verified_current
For a person required to register under SORNA, § 3583(d) authorizes the stated search condition only on reasonable suspicion and at a reasonable time and manner, with a probation-officer search also permitted when necessary for the probation officer's duties. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-016 · verified_current
The court imposes the condition of supervised release; probation may administer implementation details only within the lawful condition and the controlling circuit's nondelegation boundaries. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-017 · verified_current
Whether an internet, treatment, search, association, travel, residence, employment, financial, or third-party-notification condition is valid depends on its precise text, the sentencing record, statutory fit, constitutional burden, and controlling circuit law. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- conditions
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-018 · verified_current
Before the term expires or is terminated, the court may modify, reduce, or enlarge conditions under § 3583(e)(2), subject to Rule 32.1(c). [18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583); [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure-dec-1-2024.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583; Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1
CLM-SRTERM-019 · verified_current
Rule 32.1(c) ordinarily requires a modification hearing, counsel, and an opportunity to make a statement and present mitigation. [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(1)](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure-dec-1-2024.pdf); [18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(1)(E)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3006A)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3006A
CLM-SRTERM-020 · verified_current
The court may dispense with a Rule 32.1(c) hearing if the person waives it, or if the proposed change is favorable and does not extend the term and the government has notice, an opportunity to object, and does not object. [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure-dec-1-2024.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1
CLM-SRTERM-021 · verified_current
If the original term was shorter than the maximum authorized term, § 3583(e)(2) permits extension before expiration or termination; it does not authorize revival of an already expired term outside § 3583(i). [18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2), (i)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-022 · verified_current
After one year of felony supervised release, the court may terminate the remaining term if the person's conduct and the interest of justice warrant it after considering the factors listed in § 3583(e). [18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-023 · verified_current
Early termination is discretionary rather than automatic; the statute does not make government or probation consent a prerequisite. [18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-024 · verified_current
Effective November 1, 2025, Guidelines § 5D1.4 recommends an individualized assessment for modification, early termination after one year, and extension; its consultation recommendation does not add a consent requirement to § 3583(e). [U.S.S.G. § 5D1.4 (2025)](https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/2025-guidelines-manual/annotated-2025-chapter-5)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- mixed
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: U.S.S.G. §§ 5D1.3–5D1.4, 5F1.5 (2025); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-025 · verified_current
Section 3583(e) permits a court to consider excess imprisonment and other verified post-sentencing circumstances when deciding modification or termination, but *Johnson* does not require a particular equitable result. [*Johnson*, 529 U.S. at 60](https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USREPORTS-529/pdf/USREPORTS-529-53.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 529 U.S. 53 (2000); 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-026 · verified_current
For modification, termination, extension, and revocation decisions under § 3583(e), the court considers only the factors that subsection expressly lists, including § 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B)–(D), (a)(4)–(7), but not § 3553(a)(2)(A). [18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- modification_extension_and_early_termination
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3551, 3552, 3553; 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583
CLM-SRTERM-027 · verified_current
The sentencing court may transfer jurisdiction over supervised release to another district only with that district court's concurrence; after transfer, the receiving court may exercise the statutory powers specified in § 3605. [18 U.S.C. § 3605](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3605)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- transfer_and_record_controls
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3605
CLM-SRTERM-028 · verified_current
Supervision in another district is not by itself a transfer of judicial jurisdiction; the transfer order, concurrence, docket, and probation arrangements must be distinguished. [18 U.S.C. § 3605](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3605)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- transfer_and_record_controls
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. § 3605
CLM-SRTERM-029 · verified_current
A filing should identify the court holding jurisdiction, requested statutory action, current term calculation, exact condition or relief, supporting record, and any pending violation or transfer proceeding. [18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(e), 3605](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/3583)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- transfer_and_record_controls
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583; 18 U.S.C. § 3605
CLM-SRTERM-030 · verified_current
Rule 32.1(d) contains only a cross-reference to the governing disposition statutes; it does not itself require written or oral findings, so any findings or reasons requirement must come from another verified authority. [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(d)](https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2025-02/federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure-dec-1-2024.pdf)
- jurisdiction
- federal_nationwide_with_express_circuit_record_and_consequence_specific_limits
- procedural posture
- transfer_and_record_controls
- classification
- binding
- last verified
- 2026-08-25
- known limitations
- The offense statute and date, judgment, release and custody chronology, conditions, violation record, jurisdiction transfer, controlling circuit, local rules, collateral-consequence jurisdiction, and requested relief remain required where identified.
- researcher notes
- Current official Code, national rules, 2025 Guidelines, and Supreme Court primary sources reviewed; no unsupported nationwide circuit rule or individual outcome is asserted.
Authorities: 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582, 3583; Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1