JASON93 / LEGAL TECHSearch the reference
AuthorityCurrent through August 26, 2026View as Markdown

Legal review · Links checked : the source is available · Scope & methodology

This record is not a citator check. Confirm later history and treatment before relying on it.

authority type
case
jurisdiction
federal_ninth_circuit
publication status
published_precedential_opinion
precedential status
binding_in_ca9
decision or issuance date
2011-08-03
subsequent history
Bounded public-source treatment review completed through 2026-08-25; no explicit adverse treatment located.
negative treatment status
No explicit adverse treatment located in a bounded public-source review through 2026-08-25; comprehensive commercial citator not run.
material limitations
Official published opinion reviewed. Federal BOP program-eligibility posture; the COA footnote does not decide merits or classification.

Open official source ↗

Linked modules

Close v. Thomas

Holdings used

  • A person in federal custody does not need a COA to appeal denial of a properly classified § 2241 petition.

Material limitation

Binding only in the Ninth Circuit and only for the bounded procedural postures in the linked claims. Official published opinion reviewed. Federal BOP program-eligibility posture; the COA footnote does not decide merits or classification. A comprehensive commercial citator was not run.

Official source and pinpoints

653 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. 2011), 653 F.3d 974 n.2: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/08/03/10-35850.pdf

Linked claims

  • CLM-CIR9-005